Why do we say that the institutionalization of IPE in Great Britain owes a great deal to Susan Strange and her desire to build IPE on multidisciplinary foundations?

What were the "institutionalized orthodoxies" within the various disciplines in social sciences that needed to be contested according to the review of the international political economy inaugural editorial?

Why are Susan Strange and the British school "hyperglobalist"?

Why did Strange find absurd the notion that US power was in decline in the 1980s?

What are the key dimensions of structural power according to Susan Strange?

Why have the impersonal forces of the world markets become so important since the end of the second world war?

Susan Strange wrote in the 1990s that states are no longer the primary actors on the international scene. Do you agree?

For Ronen Palan, what most clearly distinguishes heterodox IPE from orthadox IPE is the study of international finance. Do you agree?

According to Benjamin Cohen, one of the differences between the orthodox and heterodox schools is that the former systematically confronts the theories with facts. Do you agree?

What is the difference between the neo-Gramscian school and the british school?