Please read and view (where applicable) the following Learning Resources before you complete this week's assignments.

   Reading

• Review Course Preview and read Course Introduction (located in the left navigation bar)
    
• Course Text: Brannon, L. (2011). Gender: Psychological perspectives (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Preface (pp. xv–xx)
         
  • Chapter 1, "The Study of Gender" (pp. 1–3 and 14–19 only)
         
  • Chapter 2, "Researching Sex and Gender" (pp. 20–35 as needed and pp. 35–47)
         
  • Chapter 3, "Gender Stereotypes: Masculinity and Femininity" (pp. 46–70)
         
  • Chapter 16, "How Different?" (Table 16.1 [p. 428 and pp. 433–438 only)
    
• Article:  Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic   constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. Retrieved from http://psp.sagepub.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/content/26/10/1171.full.pdf+html
    
• Article: Matlin, M. W. (1999). Bimbos and rambos: The cognitive basis of gender stereotypes. Eye on Psi Chi, 3(2), 13–14, 16. Retrieved from http://www.psichi.org/?page=032EyeWin99aMatlin

Click here for directions on how to access the database articles.

Discussion - Week 1

             

Gender Bias in Research

 Historically,  men have dominated scientific research. Accordingly, the way research  has been designed, the way studies have been conducted, and the ways in  which results have been interpreted have been at risk for gender bias.  In other words, the preconceived ideas and beliefs or unfounded  prejudice about the traits and characteristics of each gender  potentially influence the outcomes of research studies. Even today, as  women have entered into the academic and scientific world in significant  numbers, research is subject to gender bias. The implications of gender  bias can be far reaching. As the scientific community uses research  study results for subsequent research and the media picks up the results  to report findings to the public, gender bias can have a huge impact.  Society may be making decisions that are based on incorrect, misleading,  or biased data. As an example, a majority of early heart disease  research was conducted primarily using male subjects leading to the  assumption that heart disease was a man's disease and did not  significantly impact women. The gender bias in heart disease research  resulted in little attention being paid to women who had heart disease  symptoms as well as delays and limitations in the treatment for these  symptoms for many years. In reality, it is now common knowledge that  heart disease is the leading cause of death for women as it is for men.

 This  Discussion asks you to think about how gender bias can impact  scientific research and how the findings of biased research can impact  individuals and society.

To prepare for this Discussion:

 • Review the Preface, the assigned pages in Chapter 1, and pages 35–47 from Chapter 2 in the course text, Gender: Psychological Perspectives,  focusing on why researchers study gender, why researchers include  gender as a factor in psychological studies, and how researchers can be  biased in their research with regard to gender.

 Think about the following questions:

 • What impact does gender bias in research have on interpretation of the results of research studies?
 • How does gender bias in research potentially perpetuate the view of what men and women are and should be?
 • What impact could the biased research have on individuals of each gender and on society as a whole?
 • How does the media then use research findings to inform, persuade, sell, and so forth?

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 4  an analysis of the role of gender bias in the study of psychology and  in the reporting of results by others, including its implications.  Provide at least two specific examples that illustrate points you make  in your Post.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

Read a selection of your colleagues' postings.

Respond by Day 6 to at least one of your colleagues' postings in one or more of the following ways:

 • Ask a probing question.
 • Share an insight from having read your colleague's posting.
 • Offer and support an opinion.
 • Validate an idea with your own experience.
 • Make a suggestion.
 • Expand on your colleague's posting.

Return to  this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial  posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained  as a result of the comments your colleagues made.