Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

WORK1003 Individual Essay S2 2021 TASK Students are required to write an essay answering the following question: To what extent does a pluralist perspective adequately

WORK1003 Individual Essay S2 2021 TASK Students are required to write an essay answering the following question: To what extent does a pluralist perspective adequately explain the states role in regulating work and employment relations in Australia today? Please address this question with reference to one of the following issues: the mistreatment of temporary migrant workers, gender inequality at work, or workplace conflict. The essay question is designed to develop your critical, analytical, and research skills. Students are required to research and use quality scholarly sources from unit materials and library databases in answering the assignment question. You are required to cite a minimum of SIX (6) peer-reviewed academic papers (i.e. journal articles, academic books and academic book chapters) relevant to your argument. Format in-text references and reference list using the APA 6th edition Referencing Style. The following questions may help guide your thinking as you develop a response: How does a pluralist perspective explain the states role in regulating work and employment relation? How does the state in Australia regulate the one issue (and only one) you have chosen to examine: the mistreatment of temporary migrants at work, gender inequality at work, or workplace conflict? Is the states role in regulating this issue effective? In light of this assessment, what criticisms could be made of the pluralist characterisation of the state, particularly from the perspective of the other theories we have examined (i.e. unitarism, radicalism, the gender perspective)? Bring all of these elements together to succinctly explain whether you find a pluralist perspective adequate for explaining the states role in regulating work and employment relations in Australia today INSTRUCTIONS Weight: 30% Length: 1100 words (including in-text references but excluding the reference list) You must conform to the word length. If you exceed the word length, you will lose 10% of the total marks when the submission is 10% above the word length and 10% for each 10% over-length hereafter. Deadline: Wednesday 6 October 2021, 5:00pm (This is the date at which you have to submit your essay, late submissions accrue a penalty of 5% per day) Formatting: Please ensure that your work is submitted in accordance with the Universitys anonymous marking policy. Do NOT put your name on your essay, only your SID. Referencing: You are required to cite a minimum of SIX (6) peer-reviewed academic papers relevant to your argument. Format your in-text references and reference list using the APA 6th edition Referencing Style Academic honesty: Ensure your assignment does not breach the University and Business Schools Academic Honesty policy. Turnitin software is used to check for plagiarism. Even where plagiarism is unintended it is STILL plagiarism and may be subject to penalty. Extensions: If there are circumstances or essential commitments that impact on your ability to submit the essay by the deadline you will need to apply for special consideration in order to receive an extension Note: This is an individual assignment and must be entirely your own work Submission: Please do not leave your submission to the last few minutes before the deadline as this does not allow you enough leeway if there is a problem. The Turnitin submission link is found on Canvas > Assignments > Essay. If you encounter problems with the online submission you can seek assistance from the University Service Desk: ict.support@sydney.edu.au; for urgent matters call 1800 793 864 option 3. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1. Coherence and clarity (20%) a. Is the essay well-structured in line with the instructions and questions? b. Does the essay have an appropriate structure (e.g. with an introduction, a body, and a conclusion)? c. Does the sections of the essay flow logically? 2. Language and Expression (20%) a. Is the writing style clear and easy to follow? b. Is there writing style suitably academic? c. Does it avoid the use of informal or colloquial language? d. Is it free from spelling, grammatical and typographical errors? 3. Quality of the argument (20%) a. Is the argument strong and supported by an appropriate range of academic references (minimum of six)? b. Is it well researched? 4. Engagement with relevant theories (20%) a. Does the essay demonstrate knowledge of the pluralist perspective and the Australian employment relations system, and the relationship between them? b. Does it engage appropriately with other relevant employment relations theories to develop a critical analysis and argument? 5. Referencing and word count (20%) a. Is the essay appropriately referenced? b. Are all the in-text references included in the reference list? c. Is the reference list properly formatted (APA 6th edition)? Does the essay comply with the 1100 word limit requirement? SUGGESTED RESOURCES TO START YOU THINKING Most of these resources can be found in the Reading List link on the WORK1003 Canvas site. Other sources can be found by searching for the journal title on the University Library site. Pluralism and employment relations theories Bray, M., Waring, P., Cooper, R. and MacNeil, J. (2018) Employment Relations: Theory and Practice (4e), McGraw-Hill: Sydney, Chapter 3 Values Dunlop, J.T. (1958) Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt & Co, pp. 7-18 Budd, J. and Bhave, D. (2008). Values, Ideologies, and Frames of Reference in Industrial Relations. In Blyton, P., Bacon. N., Fiorito, J. and Heery, E. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: SAGE, pp. 92112. Hyman, R. (2008) The State in Industrial Relations, in Blyton, P., Bacon, N., Fiorito, J. and Heery, E. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations, Sage, London, Chapter 14. Heery, E. (2016). British Industrial Relations Pluralism in the Era of Neoliberalism. Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(1): 3-24. Ackers, P. (2002). Reframing employment relations: the case for neo-pluralism. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(1), 2-19 Dabscheck, B., 1983. Of mountains and routes over them: a survey of theories of industrial relations. Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(4), 485-506. Australian employment relations general sources Wright, C.F. & Kaine, S. (2021). Employment relations in Australia. In: Bamber, G.J., Cooke, F.L., Doellgast, V. & Wright, C.F. (eds), International and Comparative Employment Relations (7th edition). London: Sage, Chapter 5. Hancock, K. and Lansbury, R.D. (2016). Industrial Relations Reform: Looking to the Future, Federation Press: Sydney Birch, E. and Preston, A. (2021) The Australian labour market in 2020. Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(3): 303-320. Wilkins, R. and Wooden, M. (2014) Two decades of change: the Australian labour market, 19932013. Australian Economic Review, 47(4): 417-431. Clibborn, S. (2021) Australian industrial relations in 2020: COVID-19, crisis and opportunity. Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(3): 291-302. The mistreatment of temporary migrants at work Wright, C.F and Clibborn, S (2020) A guest-worker state? The declining power and agency of migrant labour in Australia, Economic and Labour Relations Review 31(1), 34-58. Clibborn, S. and Wright, C.F. (2020) COVID-19 and the policy-induced vulnerabilities of temporary migrant workers in Australia. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 85: 62- 70. Underhill, E., and Rimmer, M. (2016). Layered vulnerability: Temporary migrants in Australian horticulture. Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(5), 608626 Clibborn, S. and Wright, C.F. (2018). Employer theft of temporary migrant workers wages in Australia: Why has the state failed to act? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 29(2), 207-227 Boucher, A. (2019) Measuring migrant worker rights violations in practice: The example of temporary skilled visas in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(2), 277-301. Campbell, I., Tranfaglia, M.A., Tham, J.C. and Boese, M., 2019. Precarious work and the reluctance to complain: Italian temporary migrant workers in Australia. Labour & Industry, 29(1), pp.98-117. Gender inequality at work Baird, M. (2011). Women and Work in Australia: A Theoretical and Historical Overview. In Murray, P.A., Kramar, R. and McGraw, P. (eds), Women at Work: Research, Policy and Practice. Melbourne: Tilde University Press, pp. 1-22 Baird, M. (2011) The state, work and family in Australia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18): 3742-3754 Pocock, B. (2016). Holding up half the sky? Women at work in the 21st century. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 27(2), 147163. Foley, M. and Williamson, S. (2021) Women, work and industrial relations in Australia in 2020. Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(3): 321-337. Baird, M, Hamilton, M, Constantin, A (2021) Gender equality and paid parental leave in Australia: A decade of giant leaps or baby steps? Journal of Industrial Relations. Epub ahead of print 2 May 2021. DOI: 10.1177/00221856211008219 Foley, M. and Cooper, R. (2021). Workplace gender equality in the post-pandemic era: Where to next? Journal of Industrial Relations, Epub ahead of print 13 August 2021. DOI: 10.1177/00221856211035173 Workplace conflict Bray, M., Waring, P., Cooper, R. and MacNeil, J. (2018) Employment Relations: Theory and Practice (4e), McGraw-Hill: Sydney, Chapter 12 Industrial Conflict Bray, M. (2018). Workplace Cooperation and the Potential for Mutual Gains. In Bray, M., Macneil, J. and Stewart, A.R. (eds), Cooperation at Work: How Tribunals can Help Transform Workplaces. Sydney: Federation Press, pp. 1029. McCrystal, S (2019) Why is it so hard to take lawful strike action in Australia? Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(1): 129-144. Sarina, T. and Wright, C.F. (2015). Mutual gains or mutual losses? Organisational fragmentation and employment relations outcomes at Qantas Group. Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(5), 686-706. Van Gramberg, B., Teicher, J., Bamber, G.J. and Cooper, B. (2020). Employee voice, intention to quit, and conflict resolution: Evidence from Australia. ILR Review, 73(2), 393-410. Godard, J. (2011). What has happened to strikes? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(2): 282-305. OTHER SUGGESTIONS Use the Required and Optional Readings in the Tutorial Guide and the Reading List link on the WORK1003 Canvas site to help formulate your essay response. You are expected to conduct research beyond listed sources to demonstrate that your essay has been well researched. List cited sources in a Reference List commencing on the page following the last page of text. This list should include only the items you have referred to in your text. It is NOT a bibliography of everything you consulted on the topic. Consult other instructions regarding the essay in the UoS Outline and Online-Live lectures.

Attachments:

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Recommended Textbook for

Strategic Management Competitiveness and Globalization, Concepts and Cases

Authors: Michael A.Hitt, R.Duane Ireland, Robert E.Hoskisson

11th edition

978-1285425177, 1285425170, 978-1305200333, 978-1285425184

More Books

Students also viewed these General Management questions

Question

what is risk management in general? give a detailed explanation.

Answered: 1 week ago