Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
(year 3) per year lost from other products, over the three years you would be producing the new product. needed for each relevant period. Everything
(year 3) per year lost from other products, over the three years you would be producing the new product. needed for each relevant period. Everything that the consultants have calculated is correct, as far as it goes. The project will require $7 million in working capital upfront (year 0 ), which will be fully recovered in the last year of the project (year 3). The project will also utilize other equipment that the consultants did not value separately because the equipment is already owned and not being used in other projects. The equipment could instead be donated to a charity, and the tax benefit of that donation would be $2.3 million (in other words, this is the total amount that your taxes would decrease by in period 0 , if you donated the equipment rather than using it for the project). In addition, donating the equipment would also generate goodwill and increased reputation which you feel would be worth another $0.7 million (in dollars today). Unfortunately, some of the benefits of this new product line would be from customers switching from your existing products. This erosion or cannibalization would have a net (after tax) effect of $3 millio per year lost from other products, over the three years you would be producing the new product. What are the correct free cash flows (FCFs) to be used when evaluating this project? Report them in millions of dollars, not in dollars. Note that the answer is NOT the NPV, but the incremental FCFs needed for each relevant period. Hints: (a) Start from the correct Net Income which has already been given. (b) Make any additional adjustments needed for each relevant period, in order to get the final, complete set of FCFs. (c) We worked two variations of this problem (Percolated Fiber) in the class slides, so see the slides if you're not sure how to approach it. (year 3). Again, the FCFs should be expressed in millions of dollars to one decimal place (but do not include a dollar sign). The first relevant period's FCF is: The second relevant period's FCF is The third relevant period's FCF is: The last period's FCF is: (year 3) per year lost from other products, over the three years you would be producing the new product. needed for each relevant period. Everything that the consultants have calculated is correct, as far as it goes. The project will require $7 million in working capital upfront (year 0 ), which will be fully recovered in the last year of the project (year 3). The project will also utilize other equipment that the consultants did not value separately because the equipment is already owned and not being used in other projects. The equipment could instead be donated to a charity, and the tax benefit of that donation would be $2.3 million (in other words, this is the total amount that your taxes would decrease by in period 0 , if you donated the equipment rather than using it for the project). In addition, donating the equipment would also generate goodwill and increased reputation which you feel would be worth another $0.7 million (in dollars today). Unfortunately, some of the benefits of this new product line would be from customers switching from your existing products. This erosion or cannibalization would have a net (after tax) effect of $3 millio per year lost from other products, over the three years you would be producing the new product. What are the correct free cash flows (FCFs) to be used when evaluating this project? Report them in millions of dollars, not in dollars. Note that the answer is NOT the NPV, but the incremental FCFs needed for each relevant period. Hints: (a) Start from the correct Net Income which has already been given. (b) Make any additional adjustments needed for each relevant period, in order to get the final, complete set of FCFs. (c) We worked two variations of this problem (Percolated Fiber) in the class slides, so see the slides if you're not sure how to approach it. (year 3). Again, the FCFs should be expressed in millions of dollars to one decimal place (but do not include a dollar sign). The first relevant period's FCF is: The second relevant period's FCF is The third relevant period's FCF is: The last period's FCF is
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started