You are working for a large multi-national company called Blueberry (not Apple). Billions of the devices you are designing will be produced and sold. Your initial design uses a million logic elements. You tell the CEO that with one more month's work, you can reduce the design to only 100,000 logic elements. Explain what factors will affect the best decision to make - stick with the original design, or spend an extra month to reduce the number of LEs used. Your device must communicate with other devices, without a shared clock. You must therefore decide how many flip-flops to use in your synchronisers. This can be done once you have calculated an appropriate probability of failure. Explain what probability of failure you will use, and why you would not want to use a considerably lower probability nor a considerably higher probability. State any assumptions you are making and link them to real-world situations as best you can. You tell the CTO that you could come up with a more efficient design if you simply wrote one huge top-level module. You promise to document it meticulously. This business of writing hundreds of small modules causes inefficiencies, you explain. What does the wise CTO request you to do and why?