You run a large and lucrative bar and restaurant, and you have just hired Hulk, a new bouncer. You have explained to him that it is always best to be friendly and to calm angry patrons. However, one day Rocky, a local student attended the bar and got very drunk. The Bartenders, realizing that he was drunk, refused to serve him and asked him to leave. He refused to go. The manager asked Hulk to escort Rocky from the bar. Rocky refused to leave, but was forced from the building. Later that night, Rocky snuck back in to the bar. Hulk removed him again. This time, Rocky punched Hulk in the face but he fell through a glass door while doing this and cut his face badly. Which of the following is correct?

Question 10 options:

a. Rocky is an Invitee and should not have been subject to force

b. Rocky is a Licensee and should not have been subject to force

c.Due to his behaviour, Rocky was neither an invitee or a Licensee

d. Rocky was a Trespasser

e. Both C & D

None of the above

Lisa and Christina own homes on properties next to each other. There was no visible boundary between the properties. Neither remembered where the property division was. Christina noticed a diseased tree in between the properties. She said to Lisa, "the tree is on your land. If it causes any harm to my property, I will sue you. You'd better cut it down before it causes damage to my home." This alarmed Lisa and she immediately hired a company to cut down the tree and thus removed the afternoon shade to Christina's home. Later, it was shown that the tree was in fact on Christina's land (not Lisa's). Christina is enraged and sues for damages. Which of the following is correct?

Question 11 options:

Lisa is liable due to the principal of Bagosian Equitable Estoppel

Lisa can claim Promissory Estoppel

Christina cannot be successful because of Chronological Estoppel

As Lisa did not know it was on Christina's land, she cannot be found liable

Lisa and Christina own homes on properties next to each other. There was no visible boundary between the properties. Neither remembered where the property division was. Christina noticed a diseased tree in between the properties. She said to Lisa, "the tree is on your land. If it causes any harm to my property, I will sue you. You'd better cut it down before it causes damage to my home." This alarmed Lisa and she immediately hired a company to cut down the tree and thus removed the afternoon shade to Christina's home. Later, it was shown that the tree was in fact on Christina's land (not Lisa's). Christina is enraged and sues for damages. Which of the following is correct?

Question 11 options:

Lisa is liable due to the principal of Bagosian Equitable Estoppel

Lisa can claim Promissory Estoppel

Christina cannot be successful because of Chronological Estoppel

As Lisa did not know it was on Christina's land, she cannot be found liable