Your answer is partially correct. Determine the difference in allocation between the two approaches. Your answer is correct. Compute the overhead rates using the activity-based costing approach. (Round answers to 2 decimal places, es. 15.25.) What is the difference in allocation between two sxtivity cost pools and three activity cost pools? Is the difference in allocation wocth using the third activitv cost pool? Your answer is correct. Compute the overhead rate using the traditional (plantwide) approach. (Round answer to 2 decimal ploces.eg. 15.25.) Overhead rate Lily. Inc produces two types of gas grills: a family model and a deluxe model. Lily's controller has decided to use a plantwide overhead rate based on direct tabor costs. The prosident of the company recently heard of setfuth breed costing and wants to see how the results would differ if this system were used. Two activity cost pools were developed: machining and machine setup. Presented below is information related to the companys operations: Total estimated overhead costs are $455,400. Overhead cost allocated to the machining activity cost pool is $273,240 and $182,160 is allocated to the machine setup activity cost pool. (1) Determine the overhead rates using the activity-based costing approach with three cost pools. (Round answers to 2 decimol places, es. 15.25.) (2) Calculate the overhead allocation for the family model and the deluxe model using three activity cost pools. Lily, Inc. decided to implement the activity-based costing approach and was quite successful in its use. However, the controller is wondering if instead of only two activity cost poois, they shoufd expand to three activity cost pools based on the following: The estimated overhead of $455,400 is allocated as follows: machining activity cost pool $242,880, machine set up $172.040 and packaging $40,480. (1) Determine the overhead rates using the activity-based costing approach with three cost pools. (Round answers to 2 decimal places