Make a case that neither pure competition nor pure monopoly is conducive to a great deal of

Question:

Make a case that neither pure competition nor pure monopoly is conducive to a great deal of R&D spending and innovation. Why might oligopoly be more favorable to R&D spending and innovation than either pure competition or pure monopoly? What is the inverse-U theory, and how does it relate to your answers to these questions?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!