Though obscure, a firm with a very negative beta can indeed be in this situation. It must
Question:
Though obscure, a firm with a very negative beta can indeed be in this situation. It must be the case then that the firm’s project cost of capital is lower than the risk-free rate. (For example, a firm may have 90% debt at the risk-free rate of 5%, 10% equity at a rate of −1%, and a WACC of 4.4%—this is indeed less than the risk-free rate.)
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: