Go back

Constitutional Review And International Investment Law Deference Or Defiance(1st Edition)

Authors:

Prof David Schneiderman

Free constitutional review and international investment law deference or defiance 1st edition prof david
4 ratings
Cover Type:Hardcover
Condition:Used

In Stock

Shipment time

Expected shipping within 2 Days
Access to 30 Million+ solutions Free
Ask 50 Questions from expert AI-Powered Answers
7 days-trial

Total Price:

$0

List Price: $111.00 Savings: $111(100%)
Access to 30 Million+ solutions
Ask 50 Questions from expert AI-Powered Answers 24/7 Tutor Help Detailed solutions for Constitutional Review And International Investment Law Deference Or Defiance

Price:

$9.99

/month

Book details

ISBN: 0198885563, 978-0198885566

Book publisher: Oxford University Press

Get your hands on the best-selling book Constitutional Review And International Investment Law Deference Or Defiance 1st Edition for free. Feed your curiosity and let your imagination soar with the best stories coming out to you without hefty price tags. Browse SolutionInn to discover a treasure trove of fiction and non-fiction books where every page leads the reader to an undiscovered world. Start your literary adventure right away and also enjoy free shipping of these complimentary books to your door.

Book Summary: The Revival Of Interest In Comparative Constitutional Studies, Alongside The Rise Of Legal Limitations To State Action Due To Investment Treaty Commitments, Calls For A Unique Analysis Of Both Investment Law And Comparative Constitutional Law. The Unresolved Tensions That Arise Between The Two Are Only Beginning To Be Addressed By Judges. Are Courts Resisting These New International Limitations On Their Constitutional Space? Constitutional Review And International Investment Law: Deference Or Defiance? Pioneers This Discussion By Examining How A Selection Of The Highest Courts Around The World Have Addressed This Potential Discord. A Comparison Of Decisions In The US, Europe, Colombia, Indonesia, Israel, And Elsewhere Reveals That, Rather Than Issuing Declarations Of Constitutional Incompatibility, Courts Are More Likely To Respond To Constitutional Tensions Indirectly. Their Rulings Adopt Stances That Range From Hard Deference (such As The Peruvian Constitutional Court Viewing Constitutional Law And Investment Law As Entirely Compatible) To Soft Defiance (for Example The Colombian Constitutional Court Requiring Only Modest Renegotiation Of Some Treaty Terms So That They Are Constitutionally Compliant). Readers Learn That Judges Are Not Aiming To Undermine The Investment Law Regime But Are Seeking To Mitigate Constitutional Collision.