1. Do these employer statements constitute an unlawful threat in violation of Section 8 (a) (1) of the LMRA? Why or why not?
2. Do the employer statements constitute an unlawful promise of benefits in violation of Section 8 (a) (1) of the act? Why or why not?
3. Did the questioning or statements by either supervisor Bates or supervisor Lofton constitute unlawful interrogation in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the act? Why or why not?
4. Should the NLRB give consideration to its "Totality of Conduct" doctrine in reaching a conclusion about alleged violations in this case? Explain your answer.
5. Develop some guidelines for managers who may be talking with employees about the Union during an organization campaign.
6. How should the NLRB rule?