4. Rules for compulsory counterclaims differ among the states. The Minnesota rule, for example, is virtually identical
Question:
4. Rules for compulsory counterclaims differ among the states. The Minnesota rule, for example, is virtually identical to Federal Rule 13(a)(1)(A), except that the reference to
“occurrence” is omitted, which has led that state’s courts to read the rule as intending to
“insure that tort counterclaims would671not be compulsory.” House v. Hanson, 245 Minn.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Civil Procedure Cases And Materials
ISBN: 9780314280169
11th Edition
Authors: Jack Friedenthal, Arthur Miller, John Sexton, Helen Hershkoff
Question Posted: