4. Rules for compulsory counterclaims differ among the states. The Minnesota rule, for example, is virtually identical

Question:

4. Rules for compulsory counterclaims differ among the states. The Minnesota rule, for example, is virtually identical to Federal Rule 13(a)(1)(A), except that the reference to

“occurrence” is omitted, which has led that state’s courts to read the rule as intending to

“insure that tort counterclaims would671not be compulsory.” House v. Hanson, 245 Minn.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Civil Procedure Cases And Materials

ISBN: 9780314280169

11th Edition

Authors: Jack Friedenthal, Arthur Miller, John Sexton, Helen Hershkoff

Question Posted: