B10. Using the answer to Exercise B9 (g), impute missing CES-D scores. First, create a new CES-D

Question:

B10. Using the answer to Exercise B9 (g), impute missing CES-D scores. First, create a new CES-D variable so that any possible mistakes do not affect the original scores.

With the Compute Variable command, set the new variable

(e.g., newcesd) equal to the original, cesd. Then, do another Compute Variable, and set newcesd equal to the predicted value from the regression equation. Click the If pushbutton and select “Include if case satisfies condition,” and then enter: MISSING (cesd). This will result in imputations only for cases with missing CES-D scores (and nonmissing values for education and current employment status). Click continue, then OK. Then run descriptive statistics (within the Frequencies program) for both cesd and newcesd and answer the following questions:

(a) Look at the Polit2SetC dataset in Data view and find the values for the newcesd variable. Case 17 originally had a missing value for cesd.

What is the imputed value for this case on the newcesd variable?

(b) How many cases have valid CES-D scores for the newcesd variable?

(c) In an earlier exercise, we learned that there were missing values on current employment status for two women. What would explain why there are not two missing values for newcesd?

(d) Are the means for cesd and newcesd the same?

(e) Are the SDs for the two variables the same?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: