Imagine we have the following pieces of evidence. Adults with restricted frontal lobe lesions are known
Question:
Imagine we have the following pieces of evidence.
● Adults with restricted frontal lobe lesions are known to perform poorly on a certain task, unlike control subjects.
● We see from fMRI scans that frontal lobe areas are active in normal subjects who are performing the same task.
● Children at a certain age are unable to perform this task.
It seems logical to infer these two points.
● Some of the frontal lobe areas in question are not yet developed at this age.
● These are the areas responsible for someone’s ability to perform the task.
Do you think this evidence is enough to make both these inferences? Why or why not?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: