Because the elastometric connector experiments described in Section 12.3 required physical experimentation, Song and Lawson (1988) suggested

Question:

Because the elastometric connector experiments described in Section 12.3 required physical experimentation, Song and Lawson (1988) suggested us-

ing a single array design to save on the number of experiments required.

Table 12.21 shows a resolution IV 27−2 fractional factorial design and the resulting pull-o force. The factor names and levels are the same as those shown in Table 12.3 of Section 12.3. The generators for the design were F = ABC and G = ABD.

(a) What is the de ning relation for this design, and how many of the 12 control-by-noise factor interactions can be estimated clear of other main e ects or two-factor interactions?

(b) Using the FrF2 package, can you nd a 32-run resolution IV design that has more control-by-noise factor interactions clear? If so, what are the generators?

(c) Calculate a set of 31 saturated e ects for this design, and make a normal plot to determine which e ects, interactions, and confounded strings of two-factor interactions appear to be signi cant. Is there a clear interpre-

tation of any confounded strings of interactions?

(d) Make interaction and contour plots of any two-factor interactions be-

tween control factors and noise factors and use them to choose the level of control factors that will minimize the e ect of noise factors.

(e) Are there any adjustment factors? If so, what levels should be chosen to maximize the pull-o force?

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Design And Analysis Of Experiments

ISBN: 9780471661597

6th International Edition

Authors: Douglas C. Montgomery

Question Posted: