1) To understand this case, it is important to understand the Facts. Explain what the college students were told would be in the apartment. 2) The Parol Evidence Rule does not permit Extrinsic evidence to be admitted into evidence if the contract is Integrated (final and complete). Did the trial court find that the Lease was final and complete? 3) The Court of Appeals reached a different conclusion. Explain why the Court of Appeals found that the contract was ambiguous? 4) Having found that the contract was ambiguous, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and sent the case back for a trial to interpret the contract. Do you agree with the Court of Appeals or the Trial Court? Explain