2 of the Constitution of the State of Zemin provides that "the Government of Zemin may make no law that prohibits freedom of speech." In 2018, the Parliament of Zemin passes the Government Free Speech Act providing that "it shall be a crime to criticize the Prime Minister or other members of the Cabinet of Zemin." Zemin has a typical Westminster Export Model Constitution. In litigation concerning the validity of the Government Free Speech Act, which of the following is most likely to be correct? (a) The Government Free Speech Act is valid because it has been passed by the Parliament of Zemin; (b) The Government Free Speech Act is valid because Parliament is not a part of the Government under the Westminster Export Model Constitution; 2 (c) The Government Free Speech Act is valid because it is legislation passed subsequent to the entry into force of the Constitution; (d) The Government Free Speech Act is invalid because it is inconsistent with Section 2 of the Constitution; (e) The Government Free Speech Act is invalid because it identifies the Prime Minister for exemption from criticism