Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

9:07 1 LTE Pennsylvania 25,915 12 (0.00) 55 (-0.21) 28(-0.19) Rhode Island 2.021 40 (-0.61) 45 (-0.84) 48 (-1.55) 2 (1.61) South Carolina 5,918

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

9:07 1 LTE Pennsylvania 25,915 12 (0.00) 55 (-0.21) 28(-0.19) Rhode Island 2.021 40 (-0.61) 45 (-0.84) 48 (-1.55) 2 (1.61) South Carolina 5,918 26 (-0.07) 20 (0.36) 16 (0.66) 16 (0.53) S 1,572 7 (0.97) 23 (0.19) 17 (0.65) 49 (-1.68) 0 (1.22) 25 (0.09) 28 (0.04) 26 (0.09) 39 (-0.61) 14 of 33 9.49 0,662 29 (-0.19) 6 (1.08) 13 (0.72) 23 (0.11) 19 (0.19) 5,432 16 (0.42) 25 (0.12) 18 (0.42) 28 (-0.17) 17 (0.40) U 8.368 8 (0.89) 4 (1.36) 4 (1.36) 0,900 51 (-2.5 51 (-2.52) 18 (0.28) Vermont 1,637 47 (-1.22) 12 (0.55) 41 (-0.66) 18 (0.43) 7 (0.99) Virginia 18.093 45 (-1.16) 44 (-0.80) 39 (-0.58) 21 (0.18) 11 (0.71) Washington 17.890 48 (-1.37) 22 (0.19) 25 (-0.07) 46 (-1.10) 5 (1.20) West Virginia 3,412 23 (0.06) 32 (-0.15) 32 (-0.41) 1 (2.36) Wisconsin 15.863 2 (2.14) 5 (1.32) 20 (0.29) 35 (-0.45) 22 (0.15) 47 (-1.31) Wyoming 1,536 41 (-0.78) 49 (-1.44) 47 (-1.46) 38 (-0.59) 50 (-1.80) Note. E-Extraversion; A=Agreeableness; C-Conscientiousness; N=Neuroticism; 0-Openness. Volume 3-Number 5 Geographic Variation in Psychological Characteristics. Extraversion Top-10 States 2nd Quintile 3rd Quintile 4th Quintile 5th Quintile 351 Fig. 2. Map of state-level Extraversion. controlling for the other traits, we conducted five multiple re- gression analyses in which each trait was regressed onto the other four. After controlling for the other four traits, the amount. of unexplained variance left over was 78%, 48%, 46%, 96%, Top-10 States and 86% for E, A, C, N, and O, respectively, indicating that there were substantial proportions of variance unexplained. Second, to determine whether any "third" variables ac- counted for the observed state-level relationships, we conducted Agreeableness 2nd Quintile 3rd Quintile 4th Quintile 5th Quintile 352 Fig. 3. Map of state-level Agreeableness. kud2l.kutztown.edu Volume 3-Number 5 9:07 1 on request. 13 of 33 Peter J. Rentfrow, Samuel D. Gosling, and Jeff Potter TABLE 1 State Rankings and z Scores for Each Five-Factor Model (FFM) Personality Dimension LTE Volume 3-Number 5 State Sample size E A C N 0 Alabama 11,985 20 (0.22) 36 (-0.27) 36 (-0.53) 30 (-0.26) 48 (-1.32) Alaska 4,317 49 (-1.63) 51 (-4.33) 51 (-3.00) 47 (-1.20) 49 (-1.37) Arizona 12,570 24 (-0.03) 31 (-0.06) 9 (1.06) 45 (-1.09) 31 (-0.02) Arkansas 4,424 31 (-0.21) 41 (-0.53) 37 (-0.54) 10 (1.01) 27 (0.06) California 71,873 38 (-0.57) 28 (0.04) 27 (-0.13) 37 (-0.53) 6 (1.05) Colorado 11,446 28(-0.19) 29 (0.03) 15 (0.69) 50 (-1.97) 8 (0.97) Connecticut 6,836 33 (-0.36) 43 (-0.72) 46 (-1.11) 15 (0.54) Delaware 1,881 21 (0.15) 37 (-0.29) 34 (-0.48) 19 (0.21) 12 (0.65) 42 (-0.93) District of Columbia 2,155 3 (1.73) 50 (-2.13) 40 (-0.61) 31 (-0.35) 1 (3.26) Florida 27.424 10 (0.65) 14 (0.55) 8 (1.11) 36 (-0.50) 13 (0.59) Georgia 18.807 6 (1.22) 8 (0.87) 3 (1.43) 33 (-0.39) 20 (0.19) Hawaii 2,940 39 (-0,58) 24 (0.17) 49 (-1.57) 40 (-0.74) Idaho 3,178 46 (-1.22) 39 (-0.45) 26 (-0.09) 32 (-0.36) Illinois Indiana Iowa 27,739 13,515 6,514 9 (0.80) 26 (0.07) 11 (0.90) 34 (-0.36) 19 (0.38) 14 (0.71) 20 (0.21) 13 (0.88) 13 (0.88) 46 (-1.28) 30 (-0.02) 21 (0.17) 34 (-0.18) 15 (0.45) 15 (0.54) 33 (-0.44) 22 (0.15) 43 (-0.97) Kansas 6,976 13 (0.56) 17 (0.47) 5 (1.24) 34 (-0.44) 38 (-0.52) Kentucky 7,827 36 (-0.41) 21 (0.22) 19 (0.37) 7 (1.17) 45 (-1.10) Louisiana 6,519 30 (-0.20) 13 (0.55) 30 (-0.24) 8 (1.14) 29 (-0.01) Maine 3,540 11 (0.64) 46 (-0.86) 50 (-1.64) 12 (0.90) Maryland 12,286 51 (-1.99) 38 (-0.42) 35 (-0.51) 17 (0.45) Massachusetts 16,154 42 (-0.81) 40 (-0.51) 43 (-0.75) 11 (0.98) 35 (-0.22) 10 (0.74) 4 (1.20) Michigan 21,938 17 (0.37) 11 (0.69) 21 (0.21) 26 (-0.09) 36 (-0.30) Minnesota 14,532 5 (1.29) 2 (1.41) 22 (0.14) 41 (-0.80) 40 (-0.67) Mississippi 5,009 3,609 19 (0.34) 3 (1.39) 12 (0.79) 4 (1.50) 41 (-0.80) Missouri 12,565 18 (0.35) 16 (0.51) 10 (0.97) 25 (-0.09) 32 (-0.04) Montana 1,945 43 (-0.94) 42 (-0.71) 29 (-0.24) 39 (-0.71) 16 (0.43) Nebraska 4,410 4 (1.71) 10 (0.74) 7 (1.15) Nevada. 3,531 37 (-0.55) 48 (-1.41) 24 (-0.06) New Hampshire 3.255 50 (-1.87) 30 (-0.05) 44 (-0.82) 44 (-1.00) 42 (-0.83) 14 (0.70) 44 (-1.07) 9 (0.94) 14 (0.58) New Jersey. 16.580 14 (0.54) 34 (-0.17) 45 (-1.03) 5 (1.47) 15 (0.49) New Mexico 4,077 22 (0.15) 33 (-0.17) 1 (2.40) 29 (-0.20) 23 (0.14) New York 32,602 32 (-0.31) 47 (-1.17) 42 (-0.67) 3 (1.55) 2 (1.32) North Carolina 16,432 35 (-0.39) 7 (0.98) 2 (1.65) 24 (-0.06) North Dakota 2,372 1 (3.08) 1 (1.60) 23 (0.13) 43 (-0.84) 33 (-0.18) 51 (-3.12) Ohio 24,018 25 (-0.05) 27 (0.04) 38 (-0.56) Oklahoma 8,095 27 (-0.14) 9 (0.86) Oregon 10,211 44 (-1.10) 18 (0.42) 6 (1.16) 31 (-0.31) 9 (1.10) 27 (-0.15) Pennsylvania 25,915 25.015 12 (0.60) 35 (-0.21) 28 (-0.19) Rhode Island 2,021 40 (-0.61) 45 (-0.84) South Carolina 5,918 26 (-0.07) 20 (0.36) South Dakota 1,572 7 (0.97) 23 (0.19) 48 (-1.55) 16 (0.66) 17 (0.65) 6 (1.22) 2 (1.61) 16 (0.53) 49 (-1.68) 48 (-1.27) 24 (0.12) 37 (-0.46) 3 (1.26) 25 (0.09) 28 (0.04) 26 (0.09) 39 (-0.61) Tennessee 10,662 29 (-0.19) 6 (1.08) 13 (0.72) 23 (0.11) 19 (0.19) Texas 45.432 16 (0.42) 25 (0.12) 18 (0.42) 28 (-0.17) 17 (0.40) Texas Utah 8.368 8 (0.89) 4 (1.36) 4 (1.36) 51 (-2.52) 18 (0.28) 0,900 Vermont 1.637 47 (-1.22) 12 (0.55) Virginia 18.093 10,095 45 (-1.16) 44 (-0.80) Washington 17.890 48 (-1.37) 22 (0.19) 41 (-0.66) 39 (-0.58) 25 (-0.07) 18 (0.43) 21 (0.18) 7 (0.99) 11 (0.71) 46 (-1.10) West Virginia 3,412 23 (0.06) 32 (-0.15) 32 (-0.41) 1 (2.36) 5 (1.20) 22 (0.15) Wisconsin Wyoming 15,863 1,536 2 (2.14) 5 (1.32) 20 (0.29) 35 (-0.45) 41 (-0.78) 49 (-1.44) 47 (-1.46) 38 (-0.59) 47 (-1.31) 50 (-1.80) Note. E-Extraversion; A-Agreeableness; C-Conscientiousness; N=Neuroticism; 0-Openness. Volume 3-Number 5 Geographic Variation in Psychological Characteristics Extraversion Top-10 States 12d Quintile 3rd Quintile 4th Quintile 5th Quintile kud2l.kutztown.edu 351 9:03 1 ILTE This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin. Instructions 1. Discuss the average personality for your assigned state from this article State Personality (randomly assigned to students: Assigned State for Exam 3). In particular, p. 351, Table 1 is necessary to complete this assignment. You MUST discuss your assigned state; any other state will result in a score of 0. Be sure to describe each of the 5 factors, and where your state residents would fall given the results of this article. Suggested length: 2-3 pages (20 points) 2. Take this projective test. https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/HEMCR/ Describe how it is similar and different to the Rorschach test as described in the book. Also discuss the experience of taking the test. Do you think this test taking experience would be similar to taking the test in person with a psychologist? (Note that sometimes students have reported trouble getting their scores after this test. That's ok--the focus on this topic is how the process of taking this test is similar and different to the Rorschach.) Suggested length: 1-2 pages (10 points) Available on Jan 3, 2024 12:01 AM. Submission restricted before availability starts. Available until Jan 8, 2024 11:59 PM. Access Submit a Cancel S. kud21.kutztown.edu

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Introduction To Health Care Management

Authors: Sharon B. Buchbinder, Nancy H. Shanks

3rd Edition

128408101X, 9781284081015

Students also viewed these Psychology questions

Question

36. Let p0 = P{X = 0} and suppose that 0 Answered: 1 week ago

Answered: 1 week ago