a

"150 words"

The administration of a hospital learned that Doe [a pharmacist] was infected with HIV and sought to bar him from preparing IV or hyperalimentation solutions, citing the risk of transmission. Condemning the job restriction as unnecessary and detrimental to his career, Doe filed suit. In finding that Doe did not present a significant risk to others in the workplace, [the court ruled in Doe's favor]. [A nurse was found to be a significant risk to others in the workplace.] The court found that IV's, catheterizations, and dressing changes...are invasive procedures and because AIDS is fatal, even a minute risk is unacceptable.

Do you find that these to situations were handle correctly or mishandled? Where does your personal privacy end for the safety of your patients?

Write a responses summary of >150 words explaining, in detail,