A state law prohibited the public dissemination by the press of the name of an underage sexual assault victim. A reporter was covering the trial and obtained a copy of the indictment from a court clerk. In the indictment, the name of the victim was not redacted in any way. In writing her story for her newspaper, the reporter included the name of the victim. The newspaper published the reporter's story without alteration. The victim sued the newspaper and the reporter under the state statute. How should the court rule? Question 19 options: a) In favor of the victim, because the newspaper and the reporter clearly violated the state statute by disseminating the name of a rape victim. b) In favor of the victim, because the state's interest in protecting the privacy of victims could be achieved through preventing the inclusion of their names in the public record. c) In favor of the defendants, because the victim could not prove that her name was published with malice. d) In favor of the defendants, because inasmuch as the name of the victim was part of the public record, the defendants were within their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to