As someone who is PRO court expansion how would you respond to this. Pros and Cons of Expanding the Supreme Court Cons: Politicization of the Judiciary: Expanding the Supreme Court could lead to significant politicization. If the current administration or Congress drives the expansion to install justices who align with specific ideological views, it could undermine the Court's impartiality. This risk of "court-packing" might erode public confidence in the judiciary as an unbiased arbiter of the law. For instance, if a party in power were to expand the Court to shift its ideological balance, the Court might be seen as a tool of political agendas rather than an independent judicial body. Historical Precedent and Risks: The most notable historical attempt to expand the Supreme Court was President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 proposal to overcome a Court blocking New Deal legislation. This 'court-packing' plan was met with considerable resistance and was ultimately unsuccessful. Roosevelt's proposal's failure underscores the risks associated with expanding the Court for political reasons. It serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us of the potential consequences and how such moves can be perceived as efforts to undermine judicial independence and balance. Potential for Increased Partisanship: Expanding the Court could exacerbate political divisions and lead to more contentious confirmation battles. This increased partisanship might result in a Court that reflects more of the political landscape than judicial impartiality, significantly impacting its ability to function effectively as an unbiased decision-maker. This could further polarize the judicial confirmation process and contribute to a less stable and contentious judicial environment, raising concerns about the Court's effectiveness. Pros: Maintenance of Judicial Balance: The current number of justicesninehas been in place since 1869. This long-standing tradition helps maintain stability and predictability in the judicial process. Any change to the number of justices could disrupt this balance and introduce uncertainty about the Court's role and functions. Preservation of Judicial Independence: By avoiding expansion, the Court preserves its independence from political influence. The Court's current structure helps ensure that its decisions are based on legal principles rather than shifting political dynamics. Expanding the Court could jeopardize this independence and make a judiciary more susceptible to political pressures