3. For each of the following situations, state whether you believe the defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the state to allow the state to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Be prepared to justify your answers. a. Defendant lives in California. While on vacation in Wyoming, Defendant was involved in an automobile accident with Plaintiff. Plaintiff resides in Utah. Defendant has never been to Utah, nor does Plaintiff do any business in Utah. Defendant had been to Wyoming only one other time, approximately five years ago. Can a court in Wyoming exercise jurisdiction over the Defendant? Can a court in Utah? Can a court in California? b. Plaintiff runs a mail-order greeting card business in Iowa. Plaintiff sent a catalogue to Defendant in the mail. Defendant, a resident of New Jersey, after receiving the catalogue placed an order with Plaintiff over the telephone. This was the first time that Defendant ever placed an order with Plaintiff, although Plaintiff previously had sent Defendant catalogues. Plaintiff shipped Defendant the cards, but Defendant has refused to pay. Can a court in Iowa exercise jurisdiction over Defendant? Can a court in New Jersey? c. Defendant was on a business trip from Seattle, Washington to Orlando, Florida. While en route, the airplane on which Defendant was traveling made a scheduled stop in Dallas, Texas. Defendant, wanting to buy a newspaper at the Dallas airport before the flight resumed, stepped off the plane. He was