Assignment Facts:Luis and Dolly were married for 20 years. Last year, Luis filed for divorce. Dolly, the primary wage earner, has been out of the marital home since the divorce was filed. Luis has been residing in the marital home. During the last year, Dolly has spent $100,000 on living expenses. Luis believes she is deliberately dissipating funds to reduce marital assets. What is likely outcome in Florida?Springboard Research:In re Marriage of Holthaus, 387 Ill. App. 3d 367, 374, 899 N.E.2d 355, 361 (2008) Required Research:One Florida state case with similar factsAssignment Questions:Answer the following questions with one short sentence (embedded pinpoint citations for Questions 1 and 2):

1. What were the relevant facts from the Florida case? Provide a one-sentence summary with a pinpoint citation fully embedded.
2. What was the court's reasoning for its decision? Provide a one-sentence summary with a pinpoint citation fully embedded.
3. In one sentence, apply Dolly's facts to the Florida case facts from y0ur response to Question 1.
4. In one sentence, apply Dolly's facts to the court's reasoning, as stated in y0ur resp0nse to Question 2.
5. Fill in the brackets to this sentence: Therefore, according to [the case cited in y0ur response to Question 1], the court will likely rule that Dolly's living expenses are [ ].

Mork and Mindy have been involved in an adulterous relationship for the past 5 years. Mindy, who is legally married to Earl, has a one-year-old daughter named Dotty. Mork is convinced he is the father. How is a Florida court likely going to determine paternity?Springboard Research:Girard v. Wagenmaker, 437 Mich. 231, 470 N.W.2d 372 (1991)Required Research:One Florida state case with similar factsAssignment Questions:An5wer the following questions with one short sentence (embedded pinpoint citations for Questions 1 and 2):

1. What were the relevant facts from the Florida case? Pr0vide a one-sentence summary with a pinpoint citation fully embedded.
2. What was the court's reasoning for its decision? Pr0vide a one-sentence summary with a pinpoint citation fully embedded.
3. In one sentence, apply Mork's facts to the Florida case facts from y0ur resp0nse to Question 1.
4. In one sentence, apply Mork's facts to the court's reasoning, as stated in y0ur resp0nse to Question 2.
5. Fill in the brackets to this sentence: Therefore, according to [the case cited in y0ur resp0nse to Question 1], the likely outcome of determining paternity would be [ ].

Theresa consented to the adoption of her newborn. The biological father was listed as "unknown". Peter, the biological father, was partying in Ibiza for the past year and avoiding all contact with friends and family. Theresa sent Peter several texts and emails regarding her pregnancy but they all went unanswered. The adoption went through six months ago. Peter has now returned to the U.S. and wants custody. What is the likelihood of Peter gaining custody in Florida?Springboard Research:E.S. v. L.N., 231 N.E.3d 196 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024)Required Research:One Florida state case with similar factsAssignment Questions:Answer the following questions with one short sentence (embedded pinpoint citations for Questions 1 and 2):

1. What were the relevant facts from the Florida case? Provide a one-sentence summary with a pinpoint citation fully embedded.
2. What was the court's reasoning for its decision? Pr0vide a one-sentence summary with a pinpoint citation fully embedded.
3. In one sentence, apply Peter's facts to the Florida case facts from y0ur resp0nse to Question 1.
4. In one sentence, apply Peter's facts to the court's reasoning, as stated in y0ur resp0nse to Question 2.
5. Fill in the brackets to this sentence: Therefore, according to [the case cited in y0ur resp0nse to Question 1], Peter will [likely OR unlikely] gain custody.