Assume Vlad is presented with an opportunity from another tech company to develop software for a music sharing platform. By coincidence, a portion of the code he developed for the social media app could be used in the music sharing platform. Vlad doesn't feel the need to disclose it to the group because he believes the opportunity doesn't involve anything that impacts Tristan or Lea and they would never know that he reused the code. What is the best argument Tristan and Lea have against Vlad for violating their financial rights? Assume a partnership exists between Vlad, Lea, and Tristan and the state in which the business exists has the following statute: "177.1 (a) No partner shall have the right to withdraw any portion of partner's capital contribution until the dissolution of the partnership or rightful disassociation of the partner; (b) A payment or advance made by a partner to cover the obligation of a partnership constitutes a loan to the partnership which accrues reasonable interest from the date of the payment or advance." What is Lea's strongest argument for why she is entitled to a payment of $63,333 as opposed to $50,000?