Attorney Bob Cranfill represents Andrew Kuhn at his sentencing hearing following his criminal conviction. The pre-sentence report indicates that Andrew has no prior criminal record, and the trial judge asks Andrew whether that is true. After Andrew confirms the information in the pre-sentence report, the trial judge places Andrew on probation. Attorney Cranfill knows from an independent inquiry and from questioning Andrew that Andrew does have a criminal record and that the pre-sentence report is incorrect. When Judge Wrigley asks Attorney Cranfill whether he has anything to say, does Attorney Cranfill have an ethical obligation to correct the record? Group of answer choices Yes, because Attorney Cranfill is prohibited from offering evidence that he knows to be false and from making a false statement of material fact to a tribunal. No, because Andrew made the false statement, not Attorney Cranfill. No, because Attorney Cranfill would violate his duty of confidentiality if he disclosed the information about Andrew's prior record. Yes, because Andrew has committed perjury which can be imputed to Attorney Cranfill