Bob went to a car dealership to buy a new car. He gave the used car manager his keys to the car he planned to trade in to buy the new car so that the manager could place a value on the trade. Negotiations continued for hours. Tiring of the process, Bob said that he wanted his keys returned so he could leave and go home. Instead of giving the keys to Bob so he could leave, the car salesman smiled and threw the keys on top of the building housing the car dealership. The salesman said: $"$It will take about $2$ hours to retrieve your keys, so lets discuss buying the new car while we wait."

Bob, in frustration, agreed to buy the new car, paying a bit more than he wanted.

Using the IRAC analysis approach very briefly answer this: Does Bob have claim of the tort of False Imprisonment against the car salesman.?

Here is "I:" Does False Imprisonment exist.

Here is $"$R$"($the elements of false imprisonment$)$: False Imprisonment is $(1)$ intentional $(2)$ confinement of a person $(3)$ without legal privilege $(4)$ for an appreciable length of time.

You need only complete the IRAC analysis by doing the A and C sections of the analysis.

A: You do the analysis, evaluating whether each element exists.

C: You state your conclusion based on your analysis.