Draw a proper and understandable network Topology for the VMs mentioned on Packet Tracer to compare with our teachers topology because they made it confusing for us to understand:

Network Topology:

$3$ internal VMs:

Metasploitable Windows $($IPs$\text{'}$: Repo: $169\mathrm{.}254\mathrm{.}11\mathrm{.}246,$ sec$.$lab: $172\mathrm{.}20\mathrm{.}21\mathrm{.}21/24),$

Metasploitable Linux $($IPs$\text{'}$: eth$0$: $172\mathrm{.}20\mathrm{.}21\mathrm{.}22/24,$ eth$1$: $172\mathrm{.}20\mathrm{.}12\mathrm{.}22/24),$

Security Onion $($IPs$\text{'}$: mgmt: ens$192$: $172\mathrm{.}20\mathrm{.}14\mathrm{.}25/24,$ mirror: ens$224$: $172\mathrm{.}17\mathrm{.}0\mathrm{.}1/24)$

$1$ GW

$1$ external VM $->$ Kali Attacker $($IPs$\text{'}$: eth$0$: $172\mathrm{.}20\mathrm{.}12\mathrm{.}10/24,$ eth$1$: $172\mathrm{.}20\mathrm{.}14\mathrm{.}10/24)$

Pros: Can simulate attacks from internal & external

Cons: $1$ more VM $($GW$),$ more HW resources needed