During the execution of a search and seizure warrant at Thomas Smith's home, as officers moved a bag of cocaine from the bedroom to the living room, Smith spontaneously exclaimed, "It is all mine," twice. Smith was later convicted for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute, based on this evidence. Smith contended that his spontaneous admission should be suppressed due to a violation of Miranda v. Arizona, arguing it was elicited without Miranda warnings during what he considered to be custodial interrogation. The court concluded that Smith's spontaneous admission did not result from custodial interrogation as defined by Miranda. Which of the following best explains the court's decision? Group of answer choices The court found Smith was under custodial interrogation and his rights were violated The court determined that Smith's spontaneous admission was not a result of custodial interrogation or the functional equivalent of interrogation under Miranda The court ruled that all spontaneous admissions are inadmissible in court The court held that Miranda warnings are not required during the execution of search and seizure warrants