First, please read the facts carefully and identify all possible legal issues in the case. For example, Party A did XXX which will lead to YYY, thus Party A may lose the case because...// the case have a misrepresentation issue since Party A did Xx that lead Party B think Yy, then it cause B to making decision on Zz.

Secondly, do the identification the legal issues for each of the party involve. (Note: please do focus on issue spotting).

Lastly, argue further and give an example on if a factor change what the result would be for example, "Who would win the lawsuit (and why) if A, instead of acting as she did in the problem, [failed to send the notice] [wrote B urging her to perform] [never responded] [whatever]?" (Note: you may change the factor in any way you want.

Hypo facts are vague which for the purpose for you to change it, for example you may say "if the system instead on date X the warranty still works and Party A have legal stand to ask for remedy - law says party may require remedy"

HYPO 6

Hospital, a nonprofit healthcare services corporation, contracted with AF, Inc., an architecture firm, todesign a new nursing facility. Their written contract included this provision:

The parties hereto mutually agree that neither party shall be liable to the other for lost profits, lost opportunity, or consequential damages of any description, arising directly or indirectly from any breach of duty created by this Agreement or applicable law.

A year later, Hospital became aware of very serious defects in AF's design drafts which were based on fundamentally faulty engineering assumptions. Hospital terminated the parties' contract and thereafter hired another architectural firm to complete the project. Hospital then sued AF for a range of damages, including lost profit resulting from the delay in opening and operating the new facility.