• Google and read the case lawFernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014); and

Answer the following questions:

How did the Supreme Court rule on the following issues?

(1) Should consent given by the petitioner's significant other, Rojas, be deemed invalid because such was given after the petitioner was taken away by law enforcement?

(2) Does the fact that the petitioner objected to the search, at first, before he was taken away by law enforcement, satisfy the narrow exception inGeorgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 to set aside Rojas's consent?

Law cases can be found using the following websites:

• https://www.findlaw.com/
• https://www.supremecourt.gov/
• https://www.oyez.org/