Harrys daughter Abby is an avid equestrian. Harry is looking to purchase a new horse for Abby. Tom is a horse breeder located in Canby, Oregon. Tom has a mare for sale. Tom is aware that the mare suffers from a genetic malady, which makes it unsuitable as a riding horse. The genetic malady is not apparent with any visual inspections. Harry showed up at Toms place of business and inquired about the mare for sale and told Tom that hes looking for a riding horse for his daughter Abby. Tom showed the mare to Harry and talked about the mares age and feeding schedule. Tom did not mention anything about the genetic malady. Harry was very please with the look of the mare and purchased it right on the spot. After the purchase, Harry found out about the mares medical condition from an equine veterinarian and went to court seeking a rescission on the sales contract by asserting fraudulent misrepresentation by Tom. Will Harry be successful in rescinding the horse sale contract and get his money back?

Instruction: please use the IRAC method when answering the question. IRAC stands for Issue, Rule, Application and Conclusion. In other words, first you should summarize the relevant facts, and state the legal issue/question of this case, then talk about what the relevant legal rule and principle is for this case; lastly, you should apply the legal rule/principle to the facts of this case to reach a legal conclusion. The answer does not necessarily have to be long, but it should include all four elements of IRAC.