5 points Selected a corporation based on required criteria and located its SEC 10K report and followed instructions regarding length, spacing, attachments, APA formatting, etc. | 4 points Followed most of the instructions regarding selecting a corporation based on required criteria and locating its SEC 10K report and following instructions regarding length, spacing, attachments, APA formatting, etc. | 3 points Followed some of the instructions regarding selecting a corporation based on required criteria and locating its SEC 10K report and following instructions regarding length, spacing, attachments, APA formatting, etc.c. | 1 point Overall, did not follow most of the instructions regarding selecting a corporation based on required criteria and locating its SEC 10K report and following instructions regarding length, spacing, attachments, APA formatting, etc. |
20 points Clearly indicated knowledge of corporation's financial statements. Paper included accurate data, cogent arguments, and accounting terminology. | 19 points Did a good job of indicating knowledge of corporation's financial statements. For the most, paper included accurate data, cogent arguments, and accounting terminology. | 16 points Did a fairly good job of indicating knowledge of corporation's financial statements. Paper included mostly accurate data, cogent arguments, and accounting terminology, although there were some errors in applying concepts from the course to the financial statements. | 10 points Did not demostrate knowledge of corporation's financial statements. Overall, paper did include accurate data, cogent arguments, and accounting terminology. |
20 points Paper included in-depth and relevant analysis and explanations, rather than simply restating dataprovided in the financial statements (stating the obvious). | 19 points Paper included some analysis and explanations, rather than simply restating dataprovided in the financial statements (stating the obvious). | 16 points Paper included very limited analysis, or provided some faulty analysis. Some explanations were provided regarding the data. | 10 points Paper included no analysis and/or explanations, and simply restates data provided in the financial statements (stating the obvious). |
10 points Referenced only information relevant to ACCT 221 topics | 9 points Referenced mostly information relevant to ACCT 221 topics | 8 points Referenced some information relevant to ACCT 221 topics but included a fair degree of off-topic material. | 5 points Most information was off-topic with little relevance to ACCT221 topics. |
10 points Written in English using correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Business writing was correct, clear, and concise, with no use of slang or informal writing styles. . | 9 points Written in English using mostly correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Business writing was correct, clear, and concise, with no use of slang or informal writing styles. | 8 points Written in English but contained some grammar, spelling, and punctuation issues. Business writing was mostly correct, clear, and concise, with limited use of slang or informal writing styles. | 7 points Contained numerous grammar, spelling, and punctuation issues. Writing was not correct, clear, and concise,and contained use of slang and/or informal writing styles. |
5 points Included a complete list of references that were cited in paper, in proper APA format | 4 points Included list of references that were cited in paper. Reference list was either incomplete or had some minor deviations from APA formatting | 3 points Included list of references that were cited in paper. . Reference list had major deviations from APA formatting | 0 points A reference list was not included. |
5 points Provided in-text citations where appropriate, throughout paper, in proper APA format. | 4 points Provided some in-text citations throughout paper, in proper APA format, or with only minor deviations from APA. . | 3 points Provided limited in-text citations that were not in APA format. | 0 points Did not include in-text citations. |
5 points Assignment was submitted in advance of the date due. | 4 points Assignment was submitted on the day it was due. | 3 points Assigment was submitted late but extension was requested and granted prioer to due date. | 0 points Assignment was not submitted on time. |
5 points Logical, easy to follow, and included transitions between paragraphs, paragraphs contained information relevant to topic header | 4 points Fairly logical, and easy to follow, and included transitions between paragraphs, paragraphs contained information mostly relevant to topic header | 3 points Not always logical, and/or easy to follow. Included transitions between paragraphs, paragraphs contained information mostly relevant to topic header | 1 point Not always logical, difficult to follow. Topic headers were not included and/or paragraphs contained information that was not relevant to topic header |
5 points Provided a logical conclusion/summmary based on information contained in the body of the paper. | 4 points Provided a conclusion/summmary. Conclusion either introduced some new information or conclusions were drawn that were not supported by the information presented in the paper. | 3 points Provided a conclusion/summmary. However, the information contained no conclusion or summary of the information that was presented in the paper. | 0 points No conlcusion or summary was presented. |
10 points Paper submitted through TurnitIn with 20% or less similarity. Direct quotations were used appropriately and sparingly. | 9 points Paper submitted through TurnitIn with 30% or less similarity. Direct quotations were used appropriately and sparingly. | 8 points Paper submitted through TurnitIn with 30% or less similarity. Direct quotations were used unnecessarily. | 0 points Paper was submitted to TurnitIn with more that 30% similarity. |
|