In \"America's Unjust Drug War", Michael Huemer argues that drugs (not just marijuana) should be made legal, and that the legal system should deal with drugs in the same way it deals with alcohol. His core argument is that there is no principled basis for drawing a line between things we want to keep legal (e.g., alcohol, tobacco, skydiving, riding all-terrain vehicles, marrying jerks, eating atrociously unhealthy food, etc.) on the one side, and drugs on the ether. {Should the government prohibit things that are harmful to their users? Then since tobacco, alcohol, and junk food are many orders of magnitude more harmful and dangerous than drugs [see the statistics he cites and others on this), we should also prohibit tobacco, alcohol, and junk food as well. Should the government prohibit things that are harmful to non- users? Again, the same goes for alcohol, tobacco, etc....}. For this post: (i} Read Huerner's "America's Unjust Drug War". lii} State whether you think Huemer's core argument is l' I I 'I l'l I 'I l- l I r