In reality, engaging in travel often involves procuring multiple services such as accommodation and transportation. However, these services may not be perfectly divisible (that is consumable in fractional quantities) as assumed in the assignment. For example, you generally don't have the option of staying in a hotel for less than one night. Given this fact, is there any implicit similarity between the Victorian and South Australian schemes that may not be apparent from the simple interpretations of these schemes described earlier in Assumption (7)? Explain your