In this case, Dick Bentley Productions sought to purchase a car from Harold Smith Motors. The seller, Harold Smith, claimed that the car had only done 20,000 miles since a replacement engine and gearbox were installed. However, this statement was false, and the car had actually done much more mileage. The court held that the statement made by the seller was a representation that induced the buyer to enter into the contract. Since the representation was false, it constituted a misrepresentation. The court found in favor of Dick Bentley Productions, allowing them to rescind the contract and claim damages. Key points from the case include: Misrepresentation: A false statement of fact made by one party to another, which induces the other party to enter into a contract, can be grounds for rescission and damages. Reliance on Expertise: The court emphasized that the buyer relied on the seller's expertise, which made the representation more significant. Rescission and Damages: If a misrepresentation is proven, the affected party may rescind the contract and seek damages for any losses incurred