John Foster, president of Public Research Inc., has asked for your assistance in a study of the occurrence of crimes in different states before and after a large federal government expenditure to reduce crime. As part of this study, he wants to know if the crime rate after the expenditure can be predicted using the crime rate before the expenditure. He has asked you to test the hypothesis that crime before predicts crime after. Use the given graph and summary data to make a conclusion. Click here to view the regression plot and summary data. Click here to view the crime rate data set Choose the correct conclusion below. O A. Crime Before does not appear to be a significant predictor of Crime After because the regression does not indicate an association. O B. Crime Before appears to be a significant predictor of Crime After because the regression indicates positive association. O C. Crime Before appears to be a significant predictor of Crime After because the regression indicates negative association.- X Regression plot and summary data Regression Plot Crime After = - 75.7941 + 0.909763 Crime 10000- Before S = 310.171 R-Sq=95.6% R-sq(adj) =95.5% Crime After 5000- 5000 10000 Crime Before Print DoneX Crime Rate Data Set E..... x = Crime Before, y = Crime After X y X y 3860 3527 5361 1663 3829 3138 5215 1498 4692 3968 7465 5821 550 1588 3568 2959 5364 4774 4414 3890 5427 4629 1634 3902 6468 5577 3573 3060 5676 1856 3872 3368 3453 3060 5311 5111 1936 4273 5227 1893 4430 3929 6302 6030 5840 5304 1333 4653 6785 556 1083 3672 4439 4172 4804 3683 4455 3842 7080 6471 4137 3800 6608 6243 4948 4297 7131 6499 2648 2583 6334 1766 2645 2613 7901 6561 3951 3497 6282 6102 1952 1339 567 6244 6385 5007 7285 6468 6012 5215 6213 6115 10600 8799 6584 5484 4256 3784 4543 4044 2511 2336 Print Done