Mountain View has just paid a consulting firm $10,000 to evaluate the potential benefits and costs if it purchases a more advanced glass extrusion machine to replace the one currently being used (the old one) in its project. The consulting firm has come up with the following estimates: The project will last for another four years. The old machine was purchased at $900,000 four years ago. The depreciation method the firm uses was straight-line method over five years with a salvage value of 0. The old machine is projected to serve for another four years. If held to the end of four years later, the old machine could be sold for $30,000. If sold now, the old machine could be sold for $35,000. The new machine costs $1,600,000. Its final salvage value is 0 at the end of its life. It falls into the three-year property category for MACRS depreciation (Year 1: 33.33%, Year 2: 44.45%, Year 3: 14.81%, Year 4: 7.41%). The consulting firm believe that after 4 years, the new machine can be sold for $300,000. It will require an upfront increase (in year 0) in net working capital of $50,000. During the project life, the required NWC stays constant. In year 4, the firm expects to recover the NWC. The new machine will not change the revenue of the firm. The new machine will reduce COGS by $240,000 annually. Income taxes are paid at a 30% tax rate. (a) What are the incremental depreciation, incremental CAPEX, and adjustment for cash flows related to the sale of the new and the old equipment (incl. the selling price and related tax) from year 0 to year 4? (b) Calculate the expected annual incremental cash flows for years zero through four. (c) If you were the CEO of the firm, will you accept the project according to NPV rule? Assume a required return of 10%.