Please answer ASAP. Thank you

Brooklyn goes to have her nails manicured and agrees to pay $30 to the technician doing her nails. While there, Brooklyn decides that she would also like to have a pedicure. The technician informs her that pedicure will cost an additional $30. Brooklyn agrees to the price, gets the pedicure, but refuses to pay the extra amount. What is the likely result in a dispute between Brooklyn and the technician? Multiple Choice The techniclan will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; and, therefore, a valid unilateral contract. existed. The technician will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; and, therefore, Brooklyn's promise was supported by valid consideration. Brooklyn will win because the technician had a preexisting duty to have Brooklyn's feet and hands look as good as possible. Brooklyn will win because there was no valid consideration in exchange for the pedicure: The techniclan will win uniess Brooklyn can show that she had previously recelved both a manicure and pedicure for $30. If she can prove that she previously recelved both for $30, then the past expectations rule applies