Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Please help me with these multiple choice question, pick the most correct answer from 4 choices. Thank you A12 The required elements to prove fraudulent

Please help me with these multiple choice question, pick the most correct answer from 4 choices. Thank you

image text in transcribed
A12 The required elements to prove fraudulent misrepresentation are: a. The defendant making a false representation of fact, the representation causing the plaintiff to act, the defendant acting dishonestly or recklessly and the plaintiff suffering a loss b. The defendant owing the plaintiff a duty of care, the defendant exercising the required duty of care and the plaintiff suffering a loss as a result of the defendant's negligence Page 5 of 10 c. The plaintiff owing the defendant a duty of care, the plaintiff exercising the required duty of care and the defendant suffering a loss as a result of the plaintiff's negligence d. The plaintiff making a false representation of fact, the representation causing the defendant to act, the plaintiff acting dishonestly or recklessly and the defendant suffering a loss A13 Robco Lid sold a machine to a client. The client signed a contract with a term that stated they not been induced to enter into the contract by any representations other than those included in the contract. Before the sale Robco's salesperson stated the machine could produce 1000 units per hour. When installed, the machine could only produce half that amount. Which one of the following cases would be relevant to this situation? a. Sweetman v Bradfield Management Services Pty Ltd b. Bateman v Slater c. Peek v Gurney d. Krakowski v Eutolynx, Properties Ltd A14 To constitute fraud, there must be more than negligence. The defendant must have intended the false representation, or at least been reckless as to its truth. Which one of the following cases would be relevant to this situation? a. Sweetman v Bradfield Management Services Pty Ltd b. Bateman v Slater c. Derry v Peek d. Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd A15 Which one of the following is NOT a factor in determining if there has been a breach of s 18 ACL? a. Was the conduct made in trade or commerce b. Was the conduct misleading or deceptive c. Was the conduct likely to be misleading or deceptive d. Was the conduct intentional

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Environmental Law And Policy

Authors: James Salzman, Barton Thompson Jr.

5th Edition

1683287908, 978-1683287902

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions