Please provide a detailed answer to these questions with examples from the real world.

If one accepts determinism as a working assumption in the natural sciences, what implications does that have for the traditional view of human freedom that has been espoused and promoted by the past 25 centuries of Western civilization?

Can this discrepancy between traditional conceptions of what it means to be human be reconciled with the natural science/behavioristic position or are they incommensurate and fundamentally opposed?

If we accept that no one has free will or free choice, what does that imply about blaming individuals for criminal actions or giving credit to those who accomplish socially valued creative, artistic, or scientific achievements?