Police officer Summer Winter arrested Elvis Greaseley on a burglary charge. Officer

Winter neglected to give Greaseley the Miranda warnings at the time of the arrest or at any time

thereafter. During "booking" at the police station, Officer Winter required an unwilling Greaseley

to submit to fingerprinting. (Information obtained through the fingerprinting process ultimately

proved useful, because the police discovered Greaseley's fingerprints on the glass door of the

store where the burglary occurred.) After booking was completed, Detective Springer Fall

interrogated Greaseley at the police station. Detective Fall did not give Greaseley the Miranda

warnings because he (Detective Fall) erroneously assumed that Officer Winter had already done

so. In fact, however, Officer Winter had not done so. During the course of the interrogation by

Detective Fall, Greaseley confessed to the burglary for which he had been arrested. Greaseley

later retained attorney Priscilla Lisamarie to represent him in the burglary case. She has filed, on

Greaseley's behalf, a motion to suppress (i.e., motion requesting a court order excluding certain

evidence) in which she argues that the fingerprinting of Greaseley and the interrogation of him

violated his Fifth Amendment rights and his Miranda rights. Lisamarie argues, therefore, that the

exclusionary rule should be applied, so as to prevent the state from using the following evidence

against Greaseley: (A) any evidence derived from the fingerprinting that took place during

booking; and (B) Greaseley's confession. Is Lisamarie correct in her argument that Greaseley's

Fifth Amendment rights and Miranda rights were violated? Why or why not? As to the evidence

(listed above as (A) and (B) ) mentioned in the motion to suppress, state whether the

exclusionary rule would prevent the prosecution from using that evidence against Greaseley. Explain you reasoning