Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Q1) Camellia claims that Annabel did not fulfil her duties and was not competent. Further they claim that the perfume she developed for Indigo Cosmetics

Q1) Camellia claims that Annabel did not fulfil her duties and was not competent. Further they claim that the perfume she developed for Indigo Cosmetics was developed during her employ with them and therefore they own the Intellectual Property rights. Further, Dr Laurent claims that Annabel utilised his techniques and has provided that information to Indigo. Advise Camellia what actions they may be able to bring against Annabel.

Q2) Annabel claims that Camellia has no right to fire her and indeed it was them who was at fault. She claims she had not been given the opportunities which had been promised and had subsequently deprived her of the chance to develop her own fragrance. Further, she is still upset over Dr Laurent's comments towards her. Advise Annabel on any course of action she may have against Camellia.

In the IRAC format, for both questions i would like to know what is the issue I have to addressed as well as some of the common laws that i should consider writing. Thanks in advance!

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Evidence

Authors: Chris Taylor

5th Edition

1292210192, 978-1292210193

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions