Question $10(2$ points$)$

In what way does the use of acting appointments both undermine the power of the executive branch generally but increase the power of the president?

a$)$ By appointing people in an acting capacity, the president gets to see how well they do the job before appointing them formally and having them go before the Senate for confirmation. Thar's better for the Servate, too, because they can see how that person performs in the posibion.

b$)$ Acting heads of departments have as much authority as people who have been confirmed by the Senate, but the president doesn't have Congress's approval for his agency pides, so they wittse more horthe to then.

d$)$ Acting heads of departments are temporary and therefore have limited capacity. But acting appointees don't have to be confirmed by the Serute, which undermines the role of Convers and mater the preident more powerful.

d$)$ Acting appointees can't really do anything, they're just fierreheads, just there for show. Then, the president gets to make all the decisions.