Question
RaceTech plc is engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing high-performance racing cars. It wishes to build a racetrack upon which it can test
RaceTech plc is engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing high-performance racing cars. It wishes to build a racetrack upon which it can test its prototype models, and to that end, it creates a subsidiary company called RaceTrack Ltd. A suitable piece of land on which to build the testing track is located and RaceTrack purchases it using capital borrowed from RaceTech. However, shortly thereafter, the directors of RaceTrack (all of whom are also directors of RaceTech) discover that the land does not have planning permission and so RaceTrack agrees to sell the land to SkyCorp Ltd, a local construction company. However, several days later, a member of the local council indicates to the directors of RaceTrack that, should it apply for planning permission, it would certainly be granted. Accordingly, before sale of the land to SkyCorp is completed, RaceTrack transfers ownership of the land to RaceTech, and argues that the contract with SkyCorp is no longer valid as it no longer owns the land.
RaceTrack successfully applies for planning permission.
RaceTech decides that it wishes to expand into the consumer car market and, to this end, it created another subsidiary called SpeedShift Ltd. The articles of SpeedShift provide that only directors nominated by RaceTech may sit on its board and, accordingly, all the directors of SpeedShift are either persons nominated by RaceTech, or are actually also directors of RaceTech. SpeedShift engages in research and development on a new car and this is funded exclusively by issuing shares that are purchased by RaceTech (with the result that SpeedShift becomes a wholly owned subsidiary). However, more capital is required, but the directors of RaceTech refuse to provide SpeedShift with any more capital and instead order the board of SpeedShift to cut back on its research and development. Accordingly, the directors of SpeedShift agree to cut back on research into the car's safety features. SpeedShift completes designing a new car and it is manufactured and sold to the public. However, the car turns out to be unsafe due to a defect in the car's brakes and numerous accidents occur. Those who suffered injury and loss due to the defective cars initiate proceedings against SpeedShift but, by this time, SpeedShift has entered insolvent liquidation, and has insufficient funds to meet any liability.
Advise the parties above of any potential liability they might face.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started