Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Sam, a carpenter, entered into a contract to renovate a living room for John. John nished everything except installing a new custom bookshelf. Sam went

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
Sam, a carpenter, entered into a contract to renovate a living room for John. John nished everything except installing a new custom bookshelf. Sam went off to anotherjob. John refused to pay him arguing that the job was not nished. Which of the following statements best describes whether John will need to pay Sam? a. John must pay Sam the contract price less the cost to have the work completed. This would be a example of the principle of specic performance. b,Sam is not entitled to payment in accordance with the doctrine of quantum meruit. c. Sam is in breach of contract so John does not need to pay him anything at all. d.John must pay Sam the contract price less the cost to have the work completed. This would be an example of the principle of substantial performance. e.There has been a waiver and discharge of the contract because of Sam's failure to complete the contract. Peter is an elderly man who owns a hardware store. Because of his failing health, he can no longer run the business. He wants to sell it to his nephew, Jonathan, who often helps out in the store. Jonathan cannot afford to buy the business outright, so a contract is agreed upon whereby the business will be transferred to Jonathan. In exchange, Peter will be kept on as a consultant for the rest of his life, and Jonathan will pay Peter a monthly sum. The contract also states that when Peter dies, Jonathan will continue to pay the monthly sum to Peter's widow, Lesia. Jonathan pays the monthly sum to Peter while he is alive, but after Peter's death he refuses to pay the sum to Lesia. Which of the following statements best describes whether Lesia can enforce this contract? a. She would be absolutely barred from enforcing the contract because there is no privity b. No she cannot enforce the contract but can sue for misrepresentation c. She may be entitled to a remedy using the parol evidence rule d.She may be able entitled to a remedy as a third party beneciary e. None of the above CJ enters into a contract with Maryam where Maryam agrees to buy a parcel of CJ's property to build an amusement park on it. Gavin, Maryam's new neighbour, is excited about this purchase because it will generate more customer traffic for his gas station. Maryam decides she no longer wants to build the park. Can Gavin sue Maryam? O a. No, because there is a lack of privity of contract between Gavin and Maryam. O b. No, because there is a fundamental breach of contract O c. Yes, if it is a small claims suit for potential earnings that Gavin has now lost. O d. Yes, because there is a breach of contract between Maryam and Gavin. O e. Yes, because the contract wasn't signed

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Contemporary Family Law

Authors: Douglas Abrams, Naomi Cahn, Catherine Ross, Linda McClain

5th Edition

1640205918, 978-1640205918

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions