Scenario: You are the administrator on call for a local hospital and you receive a call at 2:00 a.m. from another local hospital regarding a patient with a broken upper arm. The ED physician's assistant is calling to arrange an EMTALA transfer from his hospital to yours, but the orthopedic physician on call at your hospital is refusing to accept the transfer, stating that the patient doesn't need a higher level of care. When you ask him about that, he tells you the fracture is not displaced, and can be splinted and seen in the office. The ED physician at your hospital is very nervous about the possibility of an EMTALA violation. 1) Write an analysis (1,000-1,500 words) of the situation, how it is impacted by EMTALA, and what decision you will make as the administrator, along with your rationale and thought process. 2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Apply Rubrics EMTALA Scenario Analysis 1 2 3 Unsatisfact Less Than Satisfactory ory Satisfactory 79.00% 0.00% 74.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content Does not Demonstrate Demonstrates Demonstrate Demonstrates 40.0 knowledge of s acceptable thorough %Analyzes demonstrate s only understandin minimal the legal issues knowledge of knowledge of the g of the legal understandin surrounding the legal the legal EMTALA g of the legal the situation issues issues scenario in issues and EMTALA surrounding surrounding the module, surrounding issues describing the situation, surrounding implications, the situation the situation including the the situation, but has some and the and the the including the slight EMTALA EMTALA situation, EMTALA misunderstandi implications implications. the issues, implications. EMTALA Does not implications. ng of the (in your own Clearly how it is demonstrate Demonstrate implications. words). describes the impacted critical s only Provides a Develops an issues facing by thinking and minimal basic idea of acceptable the EMTALA, analysis of abilities for critical response and administrator, and the the situation, critical thinking and rationale for gives an decision and does not thinking and analysis for the it. Utilizes appropriate the some response, and administrat develop an analysis of situation, the situation, response, and examples. develops a or should effective response, and develops rationale. Does very strong make. with a weak not include rationale. rationale. response, examples or Introduces with minimal descriptions. appropriate rationale examples. Does not use Provides Supports main Supports Supports 30.0 points with main points main points %Integrate references, some examples, or supporting examples and with with s explanations, references, references, information explanations. examples, but minimal but fails to explanations, examples, from explanations include and and full outside and no published examples. explanations resources published references to Analysis and of how they into the references. support claims description isapply. body of paper. 20.0 %Organizat ion and Effectivene ss Paper lacks 7.0 %Assignme any discernible nt Developme overall purpose or nt and organizing Purpose claim. and ideas. Thesis Thesis and/or and/or main main claim are claim are apparent and insufficiently appropriate to developed purpose. and/or vague; purpose is not clear. direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria. Thoughtfully, analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria. Thesis and/orThesis and/or main claim main claim are clear and are forecast the comprehensiv development e. The of the paper. essence of It is the paper is descriptive contained and within the reflective of thesis. Thesis the statement arguments makes the and purpose of appropriate the paper to the clear. purpose. Statement of Sufficient Argument is Argument Clear and 8.0 justification orderly, but shows logical convincing %Argument purpose is Logic and not justified of claims is may have a few progression. argument lacking. inconsistencies Techniques presents a Constructio by the conclusion. Argument . The argument of persuasive n The lacks presents argumentatioclaim in a conclusion consistent minimal n are distinctive does not unity. There justification of evident. and support the are obvious claims. There is a compelling claim made. flaws in the Argument smooth manner. All Argument is logic. Some logically, but progression sources are incoherent sources have not thoroughly, of claims authoritative. and uses questionable supports the from noncredible credibility. purpose. introduction sources. Sources used to are credible. conclusion. Introduction Most sources and conclusion are bracket the authoritative thesis. . Surface Frequent Some Prose is Writer is 5.0 and mechanical largely free clearly in %Mechanic errors are repetitive errors or typos of command of s of Writing pervasive enough that mechanical are present, mechanical standard, (includes they impede errors but are not errors, written, spelling, although a academic punctuatio communicati distract the overly on of reader. distracting to few may be English. n, Inconsistenci the reader. present. A grammar, meaning. Inappropriat es in Correct variety of language e word language sentence sentence use) choice and/or choice structure and structures sentence (register), audienceand effective construction sentence appropriate figures of are used. structure, language are and/or word used. choice are present. 10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Template is Appropriate Appropriate not used template is template is Format appropriately used, but used. (Use of some Formatting is appropriate , or documentati elements are correct, style for although some the major on format is missing or rarely mistaken. A minor errors and lack of may be assignment followed correctly. control with present. ) formatting is apparent. No reference Reference Reference 5.0 page is page is %Research page is included. No present. included and Citations citations are Citations are lists sources (In-text used. inconsistentl used in the citations y used. paper. Sources for are paraphrasi appropriately ng and documented, direct although some quotes, and errors may be reference present page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 100 %Total Weightage speech are used. Appropriate All format template is elements are fully used. correct. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentati on is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentatio n of cited sources is free of error