Suppose you lost your job at the bakery because of something that happened that was not your fault. Your best friend Lisa works there as a clerk. You ask Lisa to ask the boss Sherri if you can you have your job back if you are cleared of any wrongdoing. Lisa informs you that she asked Sherri and Sherri said that you would get your job back if you are cleared. You were cleared of all wrong doing and now want to get your job back. Sherri refuses. You want to sue under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Based upon the court's analysis in Harmon, would this communication by Lisa to you of Sherri's promise to hire you back meet the first element of promissory estoppel and be a valid promise? a. Yes because Lisa said that Sherri said you would get your job back. b. Yes because you were cleared of all wrong doing and that in itself is enough to get your job back. c. No because there is no written contract. d. No because Lisa does not have the authority to speak on behalf of the bakery