The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur would most likely not be applied in which of the following cases by a court following the rule and reasoning applied by the court of Byrne v$.$ BoadleQuestion $2$ options:a$)$ The defendant is repairing a furnace in a building, and the building collapses when the furnace explodes.b$)$ The plaintiff picks up a bottle of champagne in the store that explodes and cuts her hand.c$)$ The plaintiff is injured by falling off the back of a snowmobile driven by a $14$ year old boy.d$)$ The defendant is repairing the roof of a building, and a person passing along the road is injured by roofing materials fallin