The following data represent soil water content (percentage of water by volume) for independent random samples of soil taken from two experimental fields growing bell peppers.

Soil water content from field I:x₁;n₁= 721

5.311.310.310.816.68.39.112.39.114.310.716.110.215.28.99.59.611.314.011.315.611.213.89.08.48.212.013.911.616.09.611.48.48.014.110.913.213.814.610.211.513.114.712.510.211.811.012.710.310.811.012.610.89.611.510.611.710.19.79.711.29.810.311.99.711.310.412.011.010.78.911.3

Soil water content from field II:x₂;n₂= 80

12.110.113.68.113.57.811.87.78.19.214.18.913.97.512.67.314.912.27.68.913.98.413.47.112.47.69.926.07.37.414.38.413.27.311.37.59.712.36.97.613.87.513.38.011.36.87.411.711.87.712.67.713.213.910.412.97.610.710.710.912.511.310.713.28.912.97.79.79.711.411.913.49.213.48.811.97.18.514.014.1

(a) Use a calculator with mean and standard deviation keys to calculatex₁,s₁,x₂, ands₂. (Round your answers to four decimal places.)

x₁=11.4236

s₁=2.0844

x₂=10.65

s₂=3.0271

(b) Let₁be the population mean forx₁and let₂be the population mean forx₂. Find a 95% confidence interval for₁₂.(Round your answers to two decimal places.)

lower limit-0.06

upper limit1.6

(c) Examine the confidence interval and explain what it means in the context of this problem. Does the interval consist of numbers that are all positive? All negative? Of different signs? At the 95% level of confidence, is the population mean soil water content of the first field higher than that of the second field?

Because the interval contains only positive numbers, we can say that the mean soil water content of the first field is higher.

Because the interval contains both positive and negative numbers, we cannot say that the mean soil water content of the first field is higher.

We can not make any conclusions using this confidence interval.

Because the interval contains only negative numbers, we can say that the mean soil water content of the second field is higher.

(d) Which distribution did you use (standard normal or Student'st)? Why?

The Student'st-distribution was used because₁and₂are unknown.

The standard normal distribution was used because₁and₂are unknown.

The Student'st-distribution was used because₁and₂are known.

The standard normal distribution was used because₁and₂are known.

Do you need information about the soil water content distributions?

Both samples are large, so information about the distributions is not needed.

Both samples are small, so information about the distributions is not needed.

Both samples are large, so information about the distributions is needed.

Both samples are small, so information about the distributions is needed.

(e) Use= 0.01 to test the claim that the population mean soil water content of the first field is higher than that of the second.

(i) What is the level of significance?

0.01

Need help with this part

State the null and alternate hypotheses.

H₀:₁₂;H₁:₁=₂

H₀:₁=₂;H₁:₁>₂

H₀:₁=₂;H₁:₁<₂

H₀:₁=₂;H₁:₁₂

(ii) What sampling distribution will you use? What assumptions are you making?

The Student'st. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with known standard deviations.

The Student'st. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with unknown standard deviations.

The standard normal. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with unknown standard deviations.

The standard normal. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with known standard deviations.

What is the value of the sample test statistic? Compute the correspondingzortvalue as appropriate. (Test the difference₁₂.Do not use rounded values. Round your answer to three decimal places.)

(iii) Find (or estimate) theP-value.

P-value > 0.250

0.125 <P-value < 0.250

0.050 <P-value < 0.125

0.025 <P-value < 0.050

0.005 <P-value < 0.025

P-value < 0.005

Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to theP-value.

(iv) Based on your answers in parts (i)-(iii), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level?

At the= 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.

At the= 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.

At the= 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

At the= 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

(v) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the population mean soil water content of the first field is higher than that of the second.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the population mean soil water content of the first field is higher than that of the second.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the population mean soil water content of the first field is higher than that of the second.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the population mean soil water content of the first field is higher than that of the second.