Victory Company entered into a two year, $2 million contract with Tasha, a sports celebrity, to promote Victory's products. The contract provided an option for an extension of another 2 years. On-Balance, a competitor of Victory, was interested in having Tasha promote its products and knew of her contract with Victory. Shortly before the end of her contract, On-Balance offers Tasha a three year, $7 million contract. Tasha did not renew with Victory and signed with On-Balance. Which statement is correct? a. On-Balance is liable for tortious interference with prospective advantage. b. Both Tasha and On-Balance are liable for tortious interference with contract. c. Victory is liable for tortious interference with contract. d. Tasha is liable for tortious interference with contract.